For many EMS providers, pain management is one of the most frequent — and most scrutinized — decisions made in the field.
The Sarasota County Fire Department recently updated its pain-management protocols, making intravenous acetaminophen the first-line medication for moderate-to-severe pain and removing opioids from front-line apparatus. Department officials said opioids would still be available under appropriate oversight when clinically necessary.
| RELATED: Why haven’t you brought IV Tylenol into your service?
The announcement quickly sparked debate among EMS providers, with many questioning whether IV acetaminophen is effective enough for severe pain — and whether removing opioids from front-line units limits provider judgment.
Here’s what EMS1 readers had to say.
“Use it — but don’t take away clinical judgment”
Several readers said IV acetaminophen can be a valuable tool, but warned against rigid protocols that limit provider discretion.
“Glad to see them have acetaminophen as a choice for analgesia. But, to replace opiates and not to allow provider judgment to select the best med for the situation says that the system does not trust its people.”
“IV acetaminophen should be considered first, but not as an absolute. The situation/injury dictates whether an opioid should be used or not.”
“Not sure about replace as (IMHO) opioids still have their place but certainly a long overdue complement to opioid analgesia.”
Others echoed the need for flexibility paired with strong education.
“While I am including this in our agency protocols, I’m not restricting my clinicians’ ability to treat pain appropriately with ALL of their pharmaceutical resources, including opioids. But allowing your front-line providers, not just your supervisors, to be clinicians and to make those choices requires a significant amount of training that is often challenging for agencies to maintain.”
“Patients don’t always want opioids”
Some EMS professionals shared positive experiences using IV acetaminophen, particularly with patients who are opioid-averse.
“This could be a great option for those with opioid tolerance or fear of opioids. We have two state prisons within our run district. I cannot tell you how many patients, from those institutions, legitimately were appropriate for pain control, but became very fearful at the mention of fentanyl.”
“We use it in the observation department and it works great. Less opioid use for sure. Patients really seem to like it. So many patients don’t want opioids. Add Toradol and it’s even better.”
“As a paramedic in San Diego CA, I have had great success with IV Tylenol and just used it today!”
One reader pointed to data showing system-wide benefits.
“Our EMS system in the Chicagoland area implemented this change several months ago, and the results have been very positive. Data show no significant difference between pre- and post-administration pain scores when comparing acetaminophen to fentanyl. Additionally, the frequency of pain management interventions has increased since the change.”
“IV Tylenol is not enough for severe pain”
Other readers strongly disagreed with using IV acetaminophen as a replacement for opioids in serious cases, arguing it is insufficient for severe trauma and acute pain.
“This is terrible! Severe pain needs fast-acting opioids, not Tylenol.”
“I do not think Tylenol should be used in dire situations.”
“This is going to be like peeing on a brush fire for pain management. Pt will hate us.”
Several comments criticized the decision more harshly.
“No, this is ridiculous and borderline torture.”
“That is medical abuse. There is not a study that supports IV Tylenol is a better option to treat moderate to severe pain in any situation.”
One anesthesia provider weighed in with clinical experience from outside the prehospital environment.
“As an anesthesia provider, that has extensive use of IV acetaminophen, and have also been published for IV acetaminophen use in the OR setting, I can tell you it does not treat moderate to severe pain anywhere near what opioids like morphine and Dilaudid can do. This is not a good move.”
“Reduce opioids — don’t eliminate them”
A common theme across responses was compromise: reduce opioid use when appropriate, but don’t remove them entirely.
“If it works then yes. We have to remember morphine, as an example, is also given for side effects such as CHF and the venous pooling effects. Use of opioids should not be eliminated. Reduced yes but not eliminated.”
“I do believe that would be a great idea. Maybe even the AEMT could be written in their protocol as well.”
