Trending Topics

Tactical EMS saves lives in mass shootings

The fight for life can end before a gunman is stopped — ongoing training enables medics to help in time

For more than a decade there has been debate over the role of tactical EMS providers. Recent events across the country are demonstrating the need to have trained medical providers rendering basic aid while the scene is still unsecured.

It certainly makes sense. Death from gunshot wounds usually results from a sudden lack of adequate breathing or bleeding, both of which can be addressed in the field — but in a timely manner.

I’d love to think that somewhere along the line, this disturbing trend of mass shootings will end, either because of societal intolerance or regulatory changes of some sort (no, I am not an advocate of gun control, just an advocate of ending lunatic behavior). However, I don’t see that happening any time soon. In the spirit of adapt-and-overcome, it may be time to better train EMS providers in general tactical concepts and boost their safety awareness. Not everyone should be a tactical EMS provider, just like not everyone should be a paramedic. But it becomes evident that the battle to save someone’s life from acute trauma is won or lost in the first few minutes.

If we stage, those minutes are lost. Rushing in on an active scene creates great risk. What’s the balance between the life saved and the risk taken? Tell me your opinion in the comment section.

Art Hsieh, MA, NRP teaches in Northern California at the Public Safety Training Center, Santa Rosa Junior College in the Emergency Care Program. An EMS provider since 1982, Art has served as a line medic, supervisor and chief officer in the private, third service and fire-based EMS. He has directed both primary and EMS continuing education programs. Art is a textbook writer, author of “EMT Exam for Dummies,” has presented at conferences nationwide and continues to provide direct patient care regularly. Art is a member of the EMS1 Editorial Advisory Board.