Trending Topics

Treatment in place: The future of EMS … and yes, someone has to pay for it

For decades, EMS reimbursement has depended on moving the ambulance. TIP flips that model, rewarding clinical judgment over mileage — if payers, protocols and QA can keep up.

Paramedics talking to mental behavioral health patient EMS.jpg

By Kim Stanley & Matt Zavadsky

EMS has always been a profession built on contradictions.

We are expected to arrive in under 10 minutes, solve complex medical emergencies in someone’s driveway, calm down the family dog, explain Medicare rules and somehow do it all while being told, “You’re just an ambulance ride.”

And now, we’ve entered the next great evolution in prehospital care: Treatment in place (TIP) — where EMS responds, treats appropriately, and the patient doesn’t go to the emergency department.

Which is great for patients. Great for hospitals. Great for the healthcare system. And historically, terrible for EMS financial sustainability. Because nothing says “modern healthcare” like being financially punished for doing the right thing.

But that’s changing. Slowly. Awkwardly. With lots of medical director input, and lots of advocacy.

| MORE:The Ways and Means to ensure resilient emergency medical care

Let’s talk about the benefits — and realities — of billing for Treatment in Place.

The big idea: Care without the unnecessary ride

Treatment in place is exactly what it sounds like: EMS responds to a 911 call, evaluates the patient, provides appropriate care and determines that transport is not medically necessary, instead of defaulting to the old model: “You called, we came, therefore you ride to the hospital.”

TIP supports a smarter approach:

  • Manage low-acuity conditions at home
  • Avoid unnecessary ED visits
  • Reduce system overcrowding
  • Preserve ambulance availability
  • Improve patient experience

In short: EMS finally gets to be a mobile healthcare provider, not just a medical Uber with sirens.

The problem: EMS has been stuck in the “transport = payment” era

For decades, EMS reimbursement has operated under one simple principle: No transport, no pay. EMS has long been funded as if our only billable skill is driving. Never mind the assessment. Never mind the treatment. Never mind the fact that we prevented a hospitalization. Historically, the system has rewarded only one outcome: Patient in ambulance → ambulance moves → claim gets paid. TIP breaks that model, which is exactly why it’s both promising and complicated.

The benefits of billing for treatment in place

1. It aligns payment with modern EMS practice

EMS is already providing high-level clinical care in the field:

  • CPAP
  • Naloxone
  • Glucose management
  • Behavioral health stabilization
  • Community paramedicine interventions

Billing for TIP acknowledges that care happened, even if wheels didn’t roll.

It’s reimbursement catching up with reality — about 20 years late, but still ...

2. It helps EMS systems stay available for real emergencies

Every unnecessary transport ties up:

  • Ambulances
  • Crews
  • ED beds
  • Hospital staff

TIP allows EMS to treat appropriately and return to service faster.

That means when the next cardiac arrest drops, the closest unit isn’t sitting in an ED hallway waiting for ED bed 42B.

| More: From 73 to 33 minutes: How Sacramento reinvented patient offload times

3. Patients actually prefer not going to the hospital

Contrary to popular belief, most patients are not thinking: “I hope I spend 6 hours in the ER tonight.” Many want reassurance, treatment and a plan, not a waiting room. TIP supports patient-centered care, especially when paired with follow-up resources.

4. It creates financial sustainability for progressive EMS models

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: EMS cannot innovate on bake sale funding.

If we want EMS to deliver:

  • TIP
  • Alternate destinations
  • Hospital-at-home support
  • Behavioral health crisis response
  • Preventive care interventions

EMS must be paid for outcomes beyond transport.

Billing for TIP is one of the pathways that makes that sustainable.

The realities (because this is EMS, after all)

Reality #1: Billing TIP is not “free money”

Some folks hear “treatment in place reimbursement” and think: “Finally! We’ll be rich!” Let’s all laugh together. TIP billing requires:

  • Medical director approval
  • Protocol compliance
  • Medical necessity documentation
  • Payer-specific rules
  • QA review

In other words, you don’t just write: “Patient didn’t want to go. Vitals fine. AMA-ish,” and send Medicare or other payers an invoice.

Reality #2: Not every payer plays nice

Medicare tested TIP reimbursement through ET3-style models and waivers, but broad adoption is uneven. Commercial insurers vary wildly. Medicaid rules differ state by state.

Reality #3: EMS must be ready to defend clinical decision-making

Transporting everyone is easy. Treating in place requires judgment — and accountability. Agencies must ensure:

  • Strong medical director involvement
  • Strong protocols
  • Clinical training
  • Clear documentation
  • Iron-clad quality assurance

Because the question will come: “Why didn’t you transport?” TIP reimbursement only works if EMS providers are treated and trusted as healthcare providers, ones that do not simply talk people out of going to the hospital because it’s inconvenient for the patient and the EMS agency.

A strong QA program that identifies TIP is both safe and effective is crucial. For example, you should know how often a patient who is treated on scene without going to an ED calls 911 again, or shows up at an ED, with a similar chief complaint as the original EMS response.

The bottom line: TIP billing is about more than revenue

Billing for treatment in place is not about “charging for doing less.” It’s about recognizing that:

  • EMS care is valuable
  • EMS decisions matter
  • Avoiding unnecessary transport is good medicine
  • Sustainability requires reimbursement aligned with reality

EMS is evolving.

The reimbursement system is … jogging awkwardly behind us, slightly out of breath.

But TIP billing is one of the strongest signs that EMS is finally being seen as what we’ve always been: A critical healthcare service, not just a ride.

In summary ...

Treatment in Place is the kind of progress EMS has wanted for decades: Smarter care. Better outcomes. More efficient systems. Now we just have to do what EMS always does:

  • Build the plane
  • Fly the plane
  • Document the benefits of the plane
  • And convince someone to reimburse the cost of the plane

All at the same time.

| MORE: A billion dollars of savings: The legacy of ET3


ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Kim Stanley is the chief client advocacy officer for EMS|MC.

Matt is an EMS/mobile healthcare consultant with PWW | Advisory Group, focusing on assisting local communities, EMS agencies, fire departments, ambulance services, hospitals and other healthcare organizations evaluating and improving their EMS and mobile healthcare delivery systems. Prior to joining PWW|AG, he served as the chief transformation officer for MedStar Mobile Healthcare, the Public Utility Model EMS system serving Fort Worth and 13 other cities in North Texas where he helped guide the development and implementation of innovative programs with healthcare and community partners to transform the role of MedStar in the healthcare system and community. Matt has a master’s degree in healthcare administration, with a Graduate Certificate in Healthcare Data Management. He is an emergency medical technician (EMT), past president of the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians (NAEMT) and the executive director for the Academy of International Mobile Healthcare Integration (AIMHI), an association comprised of high-performance and Public Utility Model EMS systems across the United States and Canada.