Trending Topics

The EMS Pulse: Medics weigh in on the schedule that makes an EMS career sustainable

Medics split between 24-hour rotations with long breaks and shorter shifts, while many say pay, overtime and staffing matter more than any schedule

schedule (1).png

We asked readers: What schedule best supports a sustainable EMS career? While no single rotation won out, answers fell into a few distinct camps.

| MORE: The EMS Pulse — Join the conversation

Long shifts, longer breaks

Many readers favored 24- and 48-hour rotations that trade long shifts for several days off in a row, saying the extended breaks give crews time to recover and plan their lives.

  • “24/72.”
  • “48/96.”
  • “We get 48 on 5 days off. Best schedule I’ve ever had.”
  • “24 on/24 off/24 on/5 days off is the best.”
  • “24 on, 24 off, 24 on, 5 days off with one extra day every 5 weeks like Seattle Medic One.”
  • “My personal favorite was two 24s a week on a two-week schedule; set days, so not rotating. I worked Tuesday/Friday/Sunday/Thursday. I still kick myself for leaving that.”

Shorter shifts and a predictable week

Others wanted to cap shift length at 12 hours or move closer to a traditional work week, arguing that predictability matters more than long breaks.

  • “M-F 40 hours a week, no need for OT or to work at three squads.”
  • “Never working more than 12 hours in a day.”
  • “Three 12-hour shifts per week, keeping whatever your same annual pay is.”
  • “35-hour week. Some of those shift patterns are crazy long.”
  • “I preferred 1 on/1 off/1 on/4 off in my ambulance days.”

Pay, overtime and staffing matter more than the schedule

A third group argued that no rotation works if crews are underpaid, short-staffed or constantly covering for overtime.

  • “The schedule wouldn’t matter so much if the pay was enough that people didn’t have to have a second job to afford to live. But 24/72 would be the best.”
  • “The staffing numbers are FAR more important than the schedule. A ‘perfect’ schedule with 40% of the trucks out of service helps no one.”
  • “3 12s, consecutive days. Paramedics at $95,000/year. EMTs with endorsements, $75,000/year. EMTs at $55,000/year. Only one extra shift allowed per week.”
  • “We work two 24s a week. The only problem we have is people don’t want to come in for overtime, so often shifts go uncovered. I have made a bunch of OT because of it.”
  • “The place I worked was so well staffed that you often had to fight for OT lol. I loved that schedule.”
  • “2-2-3 and 24/72. PERIOD! Any other schedule has over 800 hours of built-in overtime per year versus the 110 with these. Less time at work is less burnout!”

No one-size-fits-all option

Several readers said the right rotation depends on call volume and what a service asks of its crews.

  • “There’s no one-size-fits-all solution.”
  • “There is never a one-size-fits-all. At slower services, maybe the 48/96 makes sense. At others, the 24/72 sounds awesome. If you are at a place that is constantly going on long, out of town stuff, a staggered 12-hour shift on a 2-2-3 or 4-4 might be the ticket.”
  • “Depends on where you work. I’ve worked where we could run 5-20 calls in a 12-hour shift, and the opposite shift was the same. You are not pulling a 24- or 48-hour shift there. I’ve also worked places where a 48-hour shift was very doable.”
  • “If you’re not busy, 48/96. I loved that, with average 6-8 calls max. If you’re short staffed and busy, I’d love 10 hours paid for 12 so I’m not doing paperwork for 2 hours.”

🩺 The EMS Pulse takeaway

Readers leaned toward schedules that give medics long, uninterrupted stretches of recovery, with 24/72 and 48/96 named most often, though several preferred capping shifts at 12 hours or keeping a standard week. The more pointed message was that no rotation can offset low pay, chronic overtime or short staffing.

What schedule best supports a sustainable EMS career?



Additional comments from the inbox:

  • “48-hour straight weekend shifts were perfect for me when I was still working (retired now). I loved my job, so those 48 hours went by quickly!”

Rachel Engel is an award-winning journalist and the senior editor of FireRescue1.com and EMS1.com. In addition to her regular editing duties, Engel seeks to tell the heroic, human stories of first responders and the importance of their work. She earned her bachelor’s degree in communications from Cameron University in Lawton, Oklahoma, and began her career as a freelance writer, focusing on government and military issues. Engel joined Lexipol in 2015 and has since reported on issues related to public safety. Engel lives in Wichita, Kansas. She can be reached via email.