A deeper look at response times
Our colleagues across the pond appear to be doing something about the response time issues that can be punishing to EMS systems, and offensive to a politician in the process.
Rather than using response times as the primary indicator of quality service, management leaders at the UK national health system (NHS) are proposing to stratify the lower priority calls for EMS according to a variety of indicators.
England's system of health care is different from what we have here in the United States, and how the ambulance service is organized and run is probably different too. Yet I can't help but be impressed that the folks there are looking on how to improve their ability to manage patients in need of time-sensitive emergency care and transport by focusing on the lower-urgency incidents.
What the article doesn't comment on is whether the lowest priority calls are triaged out of the emergency system entirely, if those patients might be transported via other means, or if ambulances transport the patients to nonurgent care centers.
Without moving those patients somewhere, there may be the potential for just simply moving the backlog of requests further back into the timeline. Unfortunately the article doesn't provide any information in that area of the system.
EMS systems are complex. Many systems worldwide are experiencing major challenges in providing excellent service. There is no single magic bullet to improve a system; it will take a multidisciplinary approach to make long lasting changes that truly benefit patient care while maintaining efficiency. Looking at response times and doing something about them is one good step in that direction.