Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Get FREE CEU’s at Bound Tree University
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
Ambulance industry lawsuit dismissal upheld in Pa.

Sponsors

Sign up for FREE
Email Newsletters

EMS Management Resources

EMS Management Links

Most Popular Articles

Featured Product Categories

Crew Quarter Talk

Most Recent Posts

Most Active Posts

EMS Management Tips

EMS Management Videos


EMS Management Article

January 27, 2012

Ambulance industry lawsuit dismissal upheld in Pa.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed with the Ambulance Association of Pa.

By Brian Bowling
Pittsburgh Tribune Review

PITTSBURGH — A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a district's judge's dismissal of a lawsuit brought by the ambulance industry against health insurers.

The Ambulance Association of Pennsylvania, which represents about 200 companies and 16 individual services, including Pittsburgh's Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, claimed Highmark Inc. and six other insurance companies conspired in a racketeering scheme to force them into discounts.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. Charles Kelly, one of the attorneys representing the association, said the industry has 14 days to decide whether to ask for a new hearing before the entire 3rd Circuit bench.

"We think we're right and we're not happy with the results," he said.

Highmark spokesman Michael Weinstein said the company is happy with the ruling.

"We would encourage these ambulance providers to contract directly with Highmark as virtually all of the health care providers do in Western Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania as a whole," he said.

Insurers send payments directly to health care providers but will only send them to ambulance services that sign contracts with the insurance companies. Without a contract, insurers send payments to people who received the service, and the ambulance companies then have to try to collect the money from them.

U.S. District Judge David Cercone dismissed the lawsuit in June, ruling that state law doesn't define the ambulance companies as health care providers who are entitled to direct payments. The appeals court ruling notes that the main purpose of the law is to encourage providers to enter into contracts with insurers to slow down spiraling health care costs.

LexisNexis Copyright © 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
Copyright 2012 Tribune Review Publishing Company
All Rights Reserved


Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff.
Scot A Kreger Scot A Kreger Friday, January 27, 2012 4:02:18 PM Where does the insurance companies get their information? No, most of Pa's ambulance companies do not direct contract with them or any other insurance company.
Myra Cooley Myra Cooley Friday, January 27, 2012 4:44:18 PM I agree with you. love mom
Mark Hill Mark Hill Friday, January 27, 2012 6:28:27 PM There laws need to change to allow the ambulance to do third party billing for direct payment. Also the ambulance services should be recognized as a direct provider of service under medical direction, much like a mid-level provider does under a Doctor when they work under a group. As far as direct contexts with insurance companies this could work for the vendor of the ambulance service due to guarantee revenue as well the ability to competitive bidding of contracts.
Kim Pepper Sharpe Lewandowski Kim Pepper Sharpe Lewandowski Friday, January 27, 2012 7:47:16 PM Well that is a little strange...do you think the judge would consider ambulance crews as healthcare providers if he has an MI and needs to be transported? Would he consider "care" enroute or just a "lift"?
<