Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lifesaving information at your fingertips
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
Evolve or die: The changing face of EMS

Sponsors

Sign up for FREE
Email Newsletters

Find the Right School

Online Campus Both

EMS Management Resources

EMS Management Links

Most Popular Articles

Featured Product Categories

Crew Quarter Talk

Most Recent Posts

Most Active Posts

EMS Management Tips

EMS Management Videos


EMS Management Article

January 19, 2012


EMS News in Focus
by Art Hsieh

Evolve or die: The changing face of EMS

Community paramedicine is one sign that we are moving forward

By Art Hsieh

News that Thompson Valley, Colo., EMS is investigating the viability of community paramedicine programs is, I hope, one of many stories that I'll comment on this year.

What I said in my 5 things We Have to Do in 2012 column I meant: We have to evolve or we will surely be relegated to the cluttered little corner of professions "that never made it."

Community paramedicine is one sign that we are moving forward. In the era where health care will undergo its own revolution, EMS has to be part of the solution.

We have been part of America's health safety net for the past 35-plus years, ever since EMTALA became part of our nation's liability umbrella.

It simply makes sense that we are uniquely poised to implement unique, creative ways to improve the delivery of health care while lowering its cost to taxpayers and the insured (yeah I know, trickle down doesn't always work, but THAT's another story).

Evolutions like this also require evolution of thinking, and of learning. It's not enough to say, "Yeah, we have lots of experience, we can do this, too," and implement a complex program such as community paramedics.

Unfortunately there are many education programs that do not provide enough training to prepare EMS providers to make a transport decision safely and effectively.

As a profession, we need to ratchet up the volume and complexity of information so we can evaluate and decide who can receive such home care, and not need immediate, further evaluation by a physician.

Not everything can be taken care of by a set of protocols, especially when patients don't go by the rules.

Community paramedicine is one step. What other roles can we fill in our community? How else can we contribute to society's greater good?

 

About the author

EMS1 Editorial Advisor Art Hsieh, MA, NREMT-P currently teaches at the Public Safety Training Center, Santa Rosa Junior College in the Emergency Care Program. In the profession since 1982, Art has worked as a line medic and chief officer in the private, third service and fire-based EMS. He has directed both primary and EMS continuing education programs. A Past President of the National Association of EMS Educators, former Chief Executive Officer of the San Francisco Paramedic Association, and a scholarship recipient of the American Society of Association Executives, Art is a published textbook author, has presented at conferences nationwide, and continues to provide patient care at a rural hospital-based ALS system. Contact Art at Art.Hsieh@ems1.com.

Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff.
KevinAmy Johnson KevinAmy Johnson Friday, January 20, 2012 8:23:51 AM Yep, so right. Evolve or die is exactly what is going to happen to EMS. I think about the future of EMS all the time. When our history is so short, our future is anything but guaranteed. No matter how much I mull over our tenuous future I can never quite make my mind up on how things would look if I was king. One thing I do know, is there are a few organizations that we must steal from. These organizations, in my humble opinion have what I believe to be unique skills that could translate directly to EMS. The United States Military; my father was a corpsman in the Navy and he taught me the importance the military places on care of it's sick and injured. This tradition predates EMS by hundreds of years, thousands if you go back to Socrates. Specifically I believe the military's battle field system of care is something we could use. They do the most with the least in the worst conditions imaginable. This unfortunately may be the direction health care is headed, hopefully without the bullets flying. Local Law enforcement; the cops have their house in order. Sure there's the anti cop stuff that is constantly present, however our society as a whole supports them. How many other organizations are given the authority to not only suspend you rights, but to take life to save and protect others. They are masters at public relations, and maintaining a professional appearance. EMS doesn't hold a candle to their pr abilities and we don't generally shoot people! I would be lying if I said this final suggestion doesn't hurt my pride a bit. The fire departments of our grate nation; you can not beat the fact they have their hooks deeply embedded into the flow of money that pores out of municipal coffers. The flow may be a bit less these days, and that means EMS will get even less. This has made them a rich with equipment, training, and property. So I suggest when fire departments are responding to medical aids with fire engines, we demand they either park the fire trucks and get in the ambulance, or give EMS the money and let us do it.
Steve Cohen Steve Cohen Friday, January 20, 2012 8:42:36 AM It's all about perception, the public's and the EMS Community. The public is ready, but much of the EMS Community is not. They view EMS as a transitory job. When being an EMT is a goal and the EMS Community begins demanding a place at the Emergency Service's head table, the publice's perception and appreciation will be there. It's about 'first things first'.
Alexander Kuehl Alexander Kuehl Saturday, January 21, 2012 12:51:00 PM EMS reminds me of the GOP primary..there are , any choices of evolution. In PSMO I wrote about the different potential models: public health, public safety and medical. The leadership wants public health, the providers want public safety and the medical directors want the medical model....and the money to change has disappeared.l.
Alejandro Cabrera Alejandro Cabrera Sat Jan 21 16:52:42 PST 2012 http://www.ems1.com/ambulances-emergency-vehicles/articles/1218822-AMR-demands-time-extension-in-Wash/
Alejandro Cabrera Alejandro Cabrera Sat Jan 21 16:53:52 PST 2012 So what do you think about this article?
Aaron Orzel Aaron Orzel Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:44:27 PM I think we have a lot to give back and a lot to learn from other areas. Simply put profession professionalism along with education can aid us in getting there, but we also have to have innovators. The military is a great model just as Kevin Johnson pointed out. Corpsman, and Medics in the military are the community health workers, educators, and go-to people in the clinics, units, and communities on the military bases. Why do we not bring some healthcare costs down by implementing Paramedics into these roles. How hard would it to be to have additional knowledge in order to do much of the work in Urgent Care centers and especially in various units of small town hospitals or community health centers? Additionally we rely heavily on Nurses in the acute care and chronic care setting. Why do we not utilize Paramedics in the Critical Care, ED, and specialty areas of these facilities. Instead we have nursing staff that is overworked with no aid that could use a good set of eyes and ears that can help with assessments as well as turning and treating patients. CNA's, most tech's and various other forms of help cannot give meds, do assessments or run codes. Not only can we do these things, but many times we can do them as well as or better than the nurses. Oh, and I can say that because I work in both fields at the moment. Oh, wait wasn't that the premise of some of the medical bill that Bill Clinton tried to put through?
Jake Stein Jake Stein Wed Jan 25 21:01:42 PST 2012 Why use "techs" who bring in no reimbursement value? The 1970s and 80s are no more in the hospitals. Those standards only exist in EMS where the minimum is enough and sometimes considered too much. The reason the professions which were once "techs" in the ED, Critical Care and specialty areas advanced to degrees with expanded education is to achieve professional recognition. EMS still has not figured out the education stuff and still believes the ability to start an IV, maybe intubate and know about 30 drugs makes them ready for a critical care unit. Those who keep harping this crap have very little education and no idea how much they don't know. Don't drag down the advancesments of health care by lowering standards and replacing professionals with 3 month wonders. BTW, there is no nursing shortage and there are more than enough licensed professionals. The hospitals are forced to do more with less. But replacing licensed degreed professionals with cheaper techs is not the answer. EMS can not even pull it together to make the Associates or even a college level A&P class the standard for Paramedic while other professions have a Bachelors minimum. But then why use Paramedics when EMTs are much cheaper and according to some EBM they are better for many emergent situations. Many also believe 2 Paramedics on a truck is a waste.
Jake Stein Jake Stein Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:12:45 PM The community Paramedic is just another quick cert with some more letters to muddle the alphabet soup. The programs that exist require only a Paramedic cert which in those states the CP exits, it can be otained in 1000 hours or 6 months. Add a mere 100 -200 more hours for the CP cert and you have some one who thinks they know a little about a lot but really know almost nothing about the vast field of community health and chronic care. EMS still has not mastered the EMERGENCIES and still considers those patients with a chronic complaint like COPD, Diabetes and paralysis as a bullshit call. Until EMS takes EMERGENCIES more seriously and masters the few skills in the EMERGENCY prehospital scope of practice with an adequate education to back up those skills, it has absolutely no business adding more certs as a smoke screen to avoid the existing deficiencies. In other countries the CP would be at minimum a Bacheloors degree and probably some graduate work. The US Paramedic is still no where near being an Associates degree. It took 15 years to come up with the "new" titles in the National Scope which are just different names for the same old stuff. It will take at least another 15 years to decide upon advancing education beyond the usual 600 - 1000 hour Paramedic.
Dwight Jones Dwight Jones Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:22:19 AM Excellent articles, Art. As a heart safety consultant (yes, new concept..) I would suggest reaching into the pool of CPR and BLS-trained citizens as partners for EMS. For example, SCA victims in high rise buildings cannot reliably be defibrillated inside 3-5 minutes, so survival is single-digit, and even in that statistic there are those events that are unwitnessed, those that leave TBI's and organ damage in their wake, etc. It's a wasteland. So I propose a safety architecture for these buildings that I call Tandem AED/EMS, wherein a few residents or workers, using cellular communications, access an in-house AED from the elevator lobby, and attend the victim. What's different here is EMS is not trying to do everything itself, throwing ladder trucks and firemen at the situation because that's what they have. My question is: will FF/EMS culture accept these citizen partners?
<