Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Home > Topics > EMS Management
All Articles

EMS News in Focus
by Arthur Hsieh

Learning from the Oakland whistleblower

There are shining stars in our profession who work hard to promote quality, and strive for performance improvement while minimizing the blame game

By Arthur Hsieh

Last week, an Oakland, California Fire Department employee embroiled in a long dispute with the agency filed a lawsuit claiming that his colleagues provided inadequate treatment to a man after he was fatally shot by a transit police officer.

This case bears watching, not only because it is literally in my neighborhood, but also for what the lawsuit alleges.

For the record, I don't know the plaintiff, nor do I have any inside knowledge of what happened during and after the event itself. The court system exists to tease out the details, to slowly separate fact from heresay and innuendo. However, there are several points about quality management that can be teased out.

Chaotic scenes are just that — messy, stressful and entirely difficult to manage. Training helps us prepare for these events. Experience plays its part. At the end of the day though, these are difficult cases to be on.

In the culture of medicine, we are often willing to accept that nontextbook situations will often be run in a non-textbook way — and that we often make judgments that in hindsight, might not have been the best one. That's why quality improvement exists, why we should do case reviews and and why we have to learn from those providers who were in these rare occasions.

If it is assumed that we can learn from poor judgment, the process of discovery and learning becomes easily transparent. Being clear about finding out what happened promotes even greater understanding and trust among all involved.

That philosophy runs counter to the philosophy of punishment, where it's much easier to assign blame rather than spend the energy to unearth what really happened and what could be done to prevent its reoccurrence. Unfortunately, many of our organizations resort to the latter, since systems that support the former cost money and take effort to maintain.

There are shining stars in our profession that work hard to promote quality, and strive for performance improvement while minimizing the blame game. There's a lot to learn from them; it takes that first step in attitude adjustment to start the process.

As for this case, we'll be following it carefully as it progresses. There will be more lessons to learn.

About the author

EMS1 Editorial Advisor Art Hsieh, MA, NREMT-P currently teaches at the Public Safety Training Center, Santa Rosa Junior College in the Emergency Care Program. Since 1982, Art has worked as a line medic and chief officer in the private, third service and fire-based EMS. He has directed both primary and EMS continuing education programs. Art is a textbook author, has presented at conferences nationwide, and continues to provide patient care at an EMS service in Northern California. Contact Art at Art.Hsieh@ems1.com.
Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff. If you cannot see comments, try disabling privacy and ad blocking plugins in your browser. All comments must comply with our Member Commenting Policy.

EMS1 Offers

Sponsored by

We Recommend...

Connect with EMS1

Mobile Apps Facebook Twitter Google+

Get the #1 EMS eNewsletter

Fire Newsletter Sign up for our FREE email roundup of the top news, tips, columns, videos and more, sent 3 times weekly
Enter Email
See Sample

Online Campus Both

EMS Management Videos