Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Get FREE CEU’s at Bound Tree University
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
Home  >  EMS Topics  >  Ambulances / Emergency Vehicles  >  Maine medics triple cardiac arrest survival rate
November 29, 2012

Maine medics triple cardiac arrest survival rate

Paramedics have started treating patients on the scene instead on en route

Seth Koenig
Bangor Daily News

PORTLAND, Maine -- Portland paramedics have nearly tripled their success rate in the past year of saving patients who have suffered cardiac arrest, in large part by providing emergency services on the scene and avoiding time-consuming ambulance rides to local hospitals.

The latest data, shared with city first responders Tuesday during a regular monthly review of best practices, provide statistical reinforcement to a new wave of emergency medical protocols being implemented statewide. The trend of treating patients on-site -- instead of en route -- has become the latest standard in Maine, but until now, there was only anecdotal evidence of its effectiveness widely available.

"Everybody's situation is different, but if [emergency medical responders] can produce these results, that's great," Lt. John Kooistra, paramedic and head of quality assurance for the Portland Fire and Rescue Department, said Tuesday.

The shift in procedure also means that Portland paramedics are declaring about three times as many more patients dead on scene as well, forcing the medical responders into unfamiliar territory as the ones who must break bad news to family members who may be nearby.

"That's something that's brand new to paramedics," said Portland paramedic David Pratt. "In 20 years as a paramedic, this is the first year I've had to do that. In the past, you'd be in the emergency room and the doctor would be the one to say, 'I'm sorry, there's nothing more we can do.' Now we have to have those conversations at the scene."

Kooistra said that, in addition to conducting more of the treatment on-site, more responders are being sent to each call, oftentimes freeing up a paramedic to explain to the patient's family members what's going on. The extra level of communication throughout the process can help soften the news when the patient has died, he said.

But by keeping the treatment on scene, Kooistra said, responders have much better odds of avoiding those difficult conversations. Since December 2011, Portland paramedics have handled 47 cardiac arrest cases. Using the new procedures -- administering CPR at the location and increasing the numbers of responders from six to nine -- they were able to fully revive eight of those patients, a success rate of 17 percent.

Over the previous two years, Fire Department Medical Director Dr. Matthew Scholl said, responders were able to save about 6 percent of their cardiac arrest patients. In the past 11 months, resuscitation efforts were terminated by paramedics -- meaning that the patient was declared dead on scene after treatment, but without having been taken to a hospital -- 21 times, or 44.6 percent of the time.

That's up from between 15 percent and 16 percent in previous years, when patients died more often but were declared deceased at hospitals the majority of time.

"Historically, the two of us in [a standard ambulance crew at the time] would get to the scene, we'd begin resuscitation, then roll them onto a stretcher, bring them to the ambulance and rush off to the hospital," said Deputy Fire Chief Terry Walsh. "We started over the years to add another truck to each scene, but our success rates weren't getting any better. We now know that if we get extra bodies on the scene and apply medical care on the scene, we greatly increase our success rate. There's no more blazing lights and sirens and flying down the road to the hospital."

In Portland, the previous standard response team included two paramedics with the initial ambulance, a three-person team on a following fire engine and a deputy chief. Over the past year, the department has added a second three-person follow-up contingent, allowing responders to work in fast-paced rotations administering CPR and other procedures.

By cutting out the placement of patients on stretchers and transporting them in an ambulance, responders also are cutting out 30- and 40-second gaps of time in which nobody is administering CPR or other treatments, Kooistra said. Those extra seconds, when the heart needs consistent and regular compressions to restart, are making the difference between life and death, he said.

New cardiac monitors the department has begun carrying provide instant feedback on how effective the paramedics are when administering CPR -- they should be thrusting down onto the patient's heart with both hands at a depth of 2 inches, and with a frequency of between 100 and 120 compressions per minute -- and so responders can tell when a paramedic is getting tired and a fresh set of hands is necessary.

Kooistra said the American Heart Association suggests that a responder providing CPR should administer the treatment for about two minutes before handing the duties off to somebody fresh. He said the Portland department's new "pit crew" approach, in which every responder is assigned a specialty at each scenario, at least two at each scene are dedicated chest compressors, who can rotate in and out as needed.

Scholl said the top determiners for success in a cardiac arrest case is how quickly resuscitation efforts begin and how consistently they continue. To that end, the doctor said it is important that members of the public are empowered to recognize symptoms of cardiac arrest and begin "hands only" CPR immediately, while waiting for paramedics to arrive.

"In almost every success story we see, the public is involved in that success, either with early activation of 911 or bystander CPR," Scholl said. "We have case after case after case this year of the public beginning resuscitation and giving us great success."

Scholl said members of the public should keep an eye out for individuals who are experiencing irregular breathing. He said dispatchers can talk bystanders through the correct way to administer CPR, thrusting both hands rhythmically down on the heart of the patient.

"It doesn't need to be 'no breaths at all'; it needs to be irregular breaths," he said. "Subjects may continue to gasp for seconds, if not minutes, after cardiac arrest."

While not every fire and rescue department in Maine has the same manpower or technology as Portland, which is the largest city in the state, Kooistra said the underlying method of treating cardiac arrest patients on-site can be implemented anywhere.

Indeed, Maine Emergency Medical Services, a statewide agency, saw the rate at which paramedics took patients to hospitals drop from 83 percent of the time in 2010 and 76 percent of the time in 2011 to just 50 percent of the time over the first six months of 2012, according to a July report by the Sun Journal.

Maine EMS officials told the newspaper at the time that there weren't enough data to confirm that the new protocols are saving lives. In Portland, such data have begun to come to light.

"This is a great way to broker our experience and help patients throughout the state, by getting the word out about these successes we're having," Scholl said.

LexisNexis Copyright © 2013 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
Copyright 2012 Bangor Daily News

Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff. If you cannot see comments, try disabling privacy and ad blocking plugins in your browser.
Kevin VanDaele Kevin VanDaele Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:39:48 PM This is common practice in Southeast Michigan .... we don't transport unless we get pulses back ......
Jen Turner Jen Turner Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:03:16 PM Yeah, I don't really see how this is a big deal. They are doing the same thing I've been doing for 6 years, I'm in MI, too. We don't transport anyone unless they have a pulse, period. I've had to have "the talk" with many, many families.
Todd Wadsworth Todd Wadsworth Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:09:16 PM We are just ahead of the game in Michigan. I am glad that they have made the changes necessary to improve patient outcome.
Jack Ahern Jack Ahern Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:18:29 PM Matt is a great doc, had the pleasure of working w him while he wwas in Boston!
Paul Aiden Barson Paul Aiden Barson Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:29:59 PM We hav
Chris Dye Chris Dye Thursday, November 29, 2012 5:51:14 PM One of the best continuing-education sessions I ever got to be a part of was all about how to deliver this sort of news. Should be a part of everyone's training.
William Quinby William Quinby Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:04:39 PM How many walk out of the hospital?
Mark Sachen Mark Sachen Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:05:07 PM We work our codes on-scene as well. I agree with Chris Dye.......delivering bad news is something everyone should be trained in.
Rod Sholty Rod Sholty Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:29:54 PM We were doing this in 1997 in Palm Springs, California. A few rounds of ACLS...no response...call em. Not trying to sound cold but dead is dead.
Melinda Teaster Williams Melinda Teaster Williams Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:19:59 PM I guess being from a rual EMS system we have been doing this for the 13 years I have been working. The first time I had to tell the Family I also had to then turn and say by the way the only way to get your family to our ambulance is going to be with that back-hoe. The Bridge had been washed away.
Robert Tur Robert Tur Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:24:55 PM L.A. City and County has been doing this for 30 years.
Ray Pope Ray Pope Friday, November 30, 2012 5:58:13 AM We just started introducing this in our county and have already noticed an increase in ROSC. It works period.
Jeff Dodge Jeff Dodge Friday, November 30, 2012 6:07:28 AM Working medical arrests on scene has been standard in Ontario for quite some time. We run the whole ACLS protocol (for Advanced Care Paramedics). With BLS Medics, they run 3 "non-shock" analysis before calling for termination. We really only transport ROSC's and non-asystolic trauma VSA's that are close to a hospital.
Don Leuchtag Don Leuchtag Friday, November 30, 2012 6:19:56 AM What they are doing makes sense. What I would however is some type of mechanical CPR device. We use the Life Stat units and have one on each truck. Once these units are applied and an airway is placed it takes over everything. We can litterally transport with one person in the back of truck. We have also gotten AED's in the police cruisers of the communities that we serve. They will always get to the scene befor we do. Rapid CPR and AED application are key to increasing survival.
Bob Kellow Bob Kellow Friday, November 30, 2012 6:55:10 AM ROSC is not "survival."
Friday, November 30, 2012 10:31:49 AM Who works a code, outside of trauma, only enroute anyway? Everywhere I've been we set up shop and work them. A couple other concerns: 1. Are the "on scene pronouncements being counted as a code failure or not? Or is it only those transported being counted? This will greatly impact the saving of "3 times as many." 2. What is the success criteria? Is it return of spontaneous pulse? That last one has always concerned me. There's an assumption we are altruistic and honest, but the egoist, in order to find favor and have saved a successful code could chart a pulse on arrival at the er and no one would ever be the wiser. I worked for a very large service once and for a short while they had this "code save" catergory as points contributing to the yearly pay raise evaluations I immediatelt argued that this can't be a criteria as we're rewarding some for pure chance - codes are not disbursed among all the paramedics - and since 100% chart audit was one of my duties we saw an increase in "saves" after that was posted and a save is return of spontaneous pulse - or having a pulse arriving at the ER. uh uh.....yeah no one one would cheat on that. We had a one paramedic one basic EMT system and fire were not paramedics, so it was the paramedic and the paramedic alone that made that call and charted. And they went up when it meant money. Were they more aggressive? I don't think so. Were they "feeling" a pulse now - who knows, but they were writing it down more. Reminds me of Obamascare policies - rewarding doctors if their patient "loses weight" or quits smoking, etc and I say if a pen from a pharm rep supposedly influences a doctor, do we not think the bonus money will. Bet many docs start charting much more in the way of success (fraudulently I mean) since only they really know and most patients don't ever see their own charts to debate that - same with obamaites and teachers - reward "successful" teachers with money.....well if I'm a teacher my kids are all miraculously passing now.
Scott Hughes Scott Hughes Friday, November 30, 2012 3:22:48 PM I am a former paramedic in Wake County North Carolina and we have also been doing this for years with great results.
Daniel S. Syme Daniel S. Syme Saturday, December 01, 2012 6:22:09 AM I see how this works in an urban professional system where numerous highly trained responders are nearby but I still believe that in a rural or rural-suburban setting where the paramedic may be the only paramedic within 10 miles or more and most of the responders are volunteers with limited experience load and go is still the best protocol.
Kim Tackaberry Kim Tackaberry Saturday, December 01, 2012 1:45:18 PM We have been treating MI's on the scene since the early 90's. I am totally baffled that this is something new. That's why we were called Mobile Intensive Care Units.
Christopher Maloney Christopher Maloney Monday, December 03, 2012 3:57:16 PM I'm with Don, get a "geezer squeezer"..saves a ton of fatigue and saves the available crew for drug and IV therapy. In these 2 person crews, we need all the help we can get. As far as family notification, leave it to the hospital, transport anyway..what are ya going to do, toss em back off and leave?
Blake Torrence Blake Torrence Friday, December 07, 2012 5:05:58 PM yes I second what Jen has just said. I'm down here around Houston, Tx. I definitely agree though.

Sponsored by

We Recommend...

Connect with EMS1

Mobile Apps Facebook Twitter Google+

Get the #1 EMS eNewsletter

Fire Newsletter Sign up for our FREE email roundup of the top news, tips, columns, videos and more, sent 3 times weekly
Enter Email
See Sample

Online Campus Both

Ambulances / Emergency Vehicles Videos

Featured Products